Hot!

Biafra: Drama as court sends Kanu to prison, rejects bail application



NnamdiKanu

FROM: GODWIN TSA, ABUJA

ATTEMPTS by the de­tained leader of the Indige­nous People of Biafra [IPOB] and founder of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu to regain free­dom failed Friday as Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has refused his bail applica­tion.

Two other suspects; Benja­min Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi who are standing trial with Kanu suffered simi­lar fate.

Arguing for Kanu’s re­lease, Nnoruka Udechukwu (SAN), urged the court to release him, stating that the offence he was alleged to have committed was a bail­able one.

Udechukwu argued that the Criminal Justice Act, 2015, stipulates bail for any­one not accused of a capital offence. He said that the of­fence Kanu was accused of was a ‘civil rights’ issue, adding that the right to agi­tate is guaranteed in a de­mocracy.

“The right to agitate is in­herent in a democracy. Peo­ple must not be denied their rights to protest by way of being kept in custody. If na­tional security was a ground to throw people into deten­tion the Criminal Justice Act would have said so”, he said.

However, in objecting the bail applications, the Direc­tor of Public Prosecution [DPP] Mohammed Diri, said he was “seriously opposed to this application.” He argued that the application did not fulfill certain conditions spelt out in section 162 of the Criminal Justice Act, 2015.

Diri said that Kanu might jump bail if released because according to his statement to the Department of State Services (DSS) he is a Brit­ish citizen. “He sneaked into this country. He didn’t enter the country the proper way. He may sneak out,” he said, adding “I urge this court to reject this application and or­der accelerated hearing.”

Justice Tsoho who ordered their remand in Kuje prison held that the charge against the defendants “is a grave one that will attract severe punishment upon convic­tion”.

It was the position of Jus­tice Tsoho that the charge brought against the defen­dants, which borders on trea­sonable felony, attracts life jail.

Meanwhile, Friday’s pro­ceedings witnessed another mild drama over counsel rep­resentation for the pro-Biafra advocates.